About Me

Name: EARL THINKS...
Location: Sarasota, FL
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

...SO WHAT NOW, OF,BY and FOR "THE PEOPLE"?

         It appears that the "People" are being ignored. The "People" were against TARP during the sunset of the Bush administration. The "People" were against the bailout of the banking industries. The "People" were against the bailout of the auto industry. The "People" were against the Stimulus bill. Now, the "People" are standing against the House Health Care Reform bill. To be fair, the "People" really don't know who to believe or what in the content and structure being proposed, be it the "official" bill that has been voted on and passed in the House, or the myriad of "sketches" being bantered about in the Senate. The one thing that "is" clear is the "reform" doesn't address elements that certainly need to be addressed in the existing system. Yet, the focus is being directed at the evils of the private insurance companies and not some of the effects of the existing policies in the federal program that have triggered the rise in health care costs. Restrictions on the range and reach of the private insurance by relegating them to state borders and malpractice insurance required by doctors have great impact on the cost of health care and the protections need by doctors to deliver are not even on the stove, let alone the back burner.
       All of this reveals an even greater threat to this proposition known as The United States of America; Government take over. Health Care and the reform "should" be the item that alerts us all to just what the "Hope and Change" mantra of Barak Obama truly means. For whatever reasons; anger with the Bush administration, failing economy, collapse of the real estate market, rise in oil prices, whatever. "Hope and Change" had a positive ring to it that warmed the ears enough so that we didn't all hear the underlying intentions of effecting it. People didn't hear that underlying intent of "taking America in a new direction". People never heard the concerns President Obama has had over the years as a "Constitutional Scholar" that The Constitution was restrictive to government and what it can do. Not enough "People" evaluated the carefully crafted speeches that revealed the deeper objectives of an Obama administration. Not enough "People" reflected back to something their parents might have told them about being judged by "the company they keep". "Hope and Change" attached to the face of a Black man on center stage, symbolizing  some form of "redemption" for past sins of the country was given greater value than questioning just "how" he was going to fulfill the promise of "Hope and Change". But seven months into this administration the actions are beginning to reveal to more and more each day is that the "Hope and Change" promise and the "taking America in a new direction" is taking it in the direction of rule and government that  people came here to get away from.
       We need not apologize for our greatness. The United States of America and its founding was the first of its kind in the history of mankind. Government "by the People, for the People and of the People". With a Constitution as a guideline, the "People" decided just "what" and "how" the nation would be run. The "People" elected representatives for 3 aspects of carrying out those guidelines in the Constitution, the President, the House of Representatives and the Senate. Those elected officials  had in place, by virtue of that Constitution, elements within such that neither one has absolute control or power. And a judicial branch in place to see that the "guidelines" were kept. Even freedoms that were overlooked and proved to be unjust were accounted for in the Constitution such that they can be legally addressed. We now have in power a group of people who are renouncing that Constitution in a blatant and brazen way.They have united in a way that they now, as evidenced by their
scoff at the "will of the people", are driven to insert personal and collective agendas without approval of the "People" let alone substantive support for their insertions. Actually, there is no debate.  Instead,they are in the process of regulating and regulating the cornerstone of this unique proposition we call the United States of America. FREE SPEECH.
      I once feared the parameters of free speech would reach the height of being able to yell, "FIRE!!" in a crowded theatre. I fear even more that free speech will be punishable by law should it be against that which those in government "do" or "want to do". I fear now that even being able to express my concerns "here" in the "Town Hall Blog" would put me on a list of descendents to the intrusion of government in our lives and fundamental freedoms, and by doing so, I would be running the risk of being charged with the very thing that "I" see is being done by circumventing and redefining the guideline of this proposition we have known as The United States of America; The Constitution, with treason.
Just a thought.....
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE KICHEN SINK APPROACH

            I guess President Obama is taken a page from the Hillary Clinton playbook;particularly the chapter of "The Kitchen Sink".
           Perhaps I was wrong about my view of "Get Rid of God", because this week "TheBama" has called on the religious community to get behind him and his Health Care agenda under the scriptural notion of "I am by brother's keeper",yet another out of context reference trying to establish a tie to some "moral imperative" as if God "needs" a "partner". It would seem that 20 years under the tutelage of Reverend Wright he didn't receive "Rightfully Divided Word" or, possibly, received the Word and applied his own interpretations of the intent like he has done with the Constitution. Never the less, the leader of the ideologues, who rant endlessly on the "separation of Church and State" is taking the "kitchen sink" approach in trying to get the Health Care agenda through. They have demonized the Insurance Companies, the protestors at Town Halls, the Republican Party, Doctors and their practices of treatments for monetary compensations, Sarah Palin for her "capsulation", albeit harsh, of the potential of rationalization of health care based on bureaucratic outlines, to now trying to appeal to some "moral imperative" that we must satisfy based on an out of context "Biblical Principle".
           "...people baring false witness" just about had me on the floor with laughter when I heard it. As if utilizing the "language" of the church and The Bible (specifically the Ten Commandment # 9) would demonstrate his ability to "communicate" with religious believers. As though referencing "something" from scripture put him on some special "Holy footing" for his health care intentions. This is the same man who just a few months ago, reading from his TelePrompTer, that he was going to limit charitable deductions, including Tithes to the church. There is a country song out that says, "if 10% is good enough for God, then it ought to be good enough for Uncle Sam". Well we all know that isn't how Obama and Geithner,a tax evader himself, don't think so. Nor has the government in general for a very long time. Never the less, as they seem to have a compulsion to do, this administration intends to "double down" on everything, including the Christian canon of Tithes, Offerings and Gifts of Love and take "their" share of what was commanded by God. These same people, personally, are the least charitable of our citizenry, but that is another issue.
        "Am I my brother's keeper?" was Cain's response to God when He asked of the whereabouts of his brother Abel whom he had slain. This, of course, has been altered, expanded, redefined, misquoted, misinterpreted, reinterpreted and redesigned from whole cloth for centuries, or so it would seem. In this case, it is "tied" to the "Gifts of Love" or more correctly, "Sowing Alms".   In truth, "Sowing Alms" is the third level of giving asked by God. It comes after Tithes, which is 10% of "earnings" that God wants which "belongs to Him" and "Offerings", which is an "overage" that one "offers" to that whom he selects for whatever reason. Sowing Alms refers to helping the poor, widows, orphans etc. From an abstract sense, what the administration is attempting to appeal to is aid to the poor,widows and orphans but ALSO frames as an entitlement to some who are in their state of lack either by their own design or by the system. When the edict was established by God the conditions of poverty and widow status was part of the condition of the times that was common, and God commanded His people to assist in the care of these people consistent with their abilities to assist based on the individual's abundance. God's people also had a conscience that compelled them to "do the right thing",an element that has gone the way of "Common Sense" over the last 30 years or so. This administration and the Progressives that have been appointed to it include other factors that are rooted in ideological/political stances that are designed to give them more power and control over the society. By approaching the religious community, with their "language" as "sound bites" to get them to support a health care plan that has several flaws and weaknesses that seem to get revealed daily is further evidence of the disingenuousness and condescending nature of this group of people bent on total control and manipulation of the people and Constitution under which this nation was founded on and demonstrated the fairest and productive of systems in the history of mankind. In short, they keep God in the "attic" until they think "He" can serve "them" and their agenda.
         This "new" approach to addressing the Health Care imposition (not the "debate" they would like to frame it as) is merely an attempt to demonstrate just how "noble" their intentions are. The fact of the matter is there is a population of people, "Baby Boomers" who will be coming of "age" as recipients and benefactors of the national health care system that, like social security, the government cannot pay for under the present system and maintain control. The war is against the "free enterprise system" and the liberties of the citizens of these United States (operative word being "citizens"...yet another issue). Government has redefined it's role and intent. It has raised its own levels of prominence and authority at the expense of those who put them in position. They can even give themselves raises in pay and coverage for health beyond those of the people who put them in place; and for LIFE.
        The American people need to step back and look at the bigger picture being painted by the present administration and other elected officials.
......and be mindful to not get hit in the head with "The Kitchen Sink". It is sure to leave a mark.
Just a thought......
            
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PROGRESSIVE'S PREDICATE:GET RID OF GOD AND COMMON SENSE Part 1

                  President Barak Obama is back on the “Campaign Trail”. And it’s no wonder. It’s what he does best. The Stimulus Bill was passed because, as Monica Crowley likes to reference the president, “The Bama” returned to the “Trail” to sell the bill to the people. Still hung over by the mass consumption of the “Kool-Aid”, he managed to convince enough people that this would work and produce jobs. He took his “Apology World Tour” and pretty much settled into the Oval Office to do the “little things” such as appoint some 40 Czars, orchestrate a few “Press Conferences”, see a Broadway show yadda yadda and proceeded to his Health Care issue and his “crown jewel”. The response has taken him, his administration and congress aback. “What? The American people are sober now”? The details of the bill constructed by the House were “supposed” to get lost in discovery; some 1100 pages of it. But the objections have sent them back to the checklist of actions they have taken to see to it that the “highlights” are amplified and the opposition of talk radio and Fox News, which they have been demonizing all along, would make their claims fall on deaf ears to the left and the choir on the right.
 
             “The Bama” insults the intelligence of the American People. It’s understandable. After all, politicians, both left and right, have gone through great lengths over a long period of time to dismiss “Common Sense” from any equation in the process of government. Politics has become an accepted as well as elevated, to the primary factor of making decisions in the legislative process. Progressives even go so far as to demonized the very foundation of law and the Constitution as a restrictive document and the creators of it as narrow sighted architects, who couldn’t possibly seen this far into the future and the heights we, as a nation, could rise to under it and the possibilities that the freedoms there in could offer. Progressives believe that the Constitution must be revisited and revised to accommodate the “changing times”. This too, has been a painstaking and deliberate process that can be traced back to Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, cloaked with “good intentions”, and, to some extent, justifiable. But get used to the idea that with Progressive insertions into the system, comes, what we are now being desensitized to accept as part of the “normal” and to be “tolerant” of, “unintended consequences”.

                  My grandmother used to say, “Don’t accept the will for the deed”. The expression fits a few scenarios, but in this case, what Progressives “want” us to accept, is the desired intent, or “will”, in spite of the unintended consequences that come along with the “deed”. The “will” to stimulate the economy, to advance the “green agenda” and to, now, accept the House plan for Health Care, should supersede any and all “unintended consequences” that may present themselves and are just a matter of “course”.

                  This was and is a carefully constructed, or “deconstruction” plan, depending on how you see it. Two redirections of “think” had to be imposed over several decades and a few generations to make it happen. One is the avid insistence on “the separation of Church and State”, which really isn’t in the Constitution, to remove God from government and public forum. ANY God. This in turn eliminates God and His Word from any argument or debate in government or public policies as a basis of support. This nullifies "His" morals, thus leaving "man" to establish moral parameters. Imperfect beings must now depend on other imperfect beings (though they don't think so) to set the Moral Standards.

                  Next was the dismissal of Common Sense, or, if you will, minimizing the influence of Common Sense in government and public policy by expanding freedoms “for” all to freedom “from” all, as all ones individual rights “can” infringe on the rights of others because there is no basis from which we draw from for the “greater good”. No God, no Common Sense.The “right” of a woman to go out, as men have been able to do, and have illicit sexual relations and get rid of the “unintended consequences” of that “freedom”, over those “unintended consequence”. Shame was removed from the society such that one who “stands in judgment” is labeled “intolerant” or in effect, the “new parameter” for “shame”. These are but a couple of examples of just how "unintended consequences" are validated and the "thinking" has been reprioritized.

                The cornerstone of this nation’s Declaration of Independence is the endowment by our Creator to, “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. If there is “no Creator”, then by whom are we endowed by for our, “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness”? “Progressives”? Hmmmm.

               I will readdress this at a later date, but in closing,….. Just a Thought.                      
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BLACKMAIL,SHAKEDOWN, DEMONIZATION&FALSEHOODS Part 2

  President Obama, it is a very cheap tactic to demonize opposition in order to elevate "your" position. If your position has any substance or righteousness, it should be able to stand on its own, tall against opposition regardless of the root nature, i.e. "partisan politics". It is equally a cheap tactic to infer that the "opposition" would rather do "nothing". There "is" the possibility, in spite of your inflated perception of brilliance and foresightedness, that you could just be wrong and the "opposition" just might have a better solution.
 
      Beginning with the first TARP, the tactic of “Demonization” has been in full employ in order to “move the agenda” of Progressives. The tactic is specifically designed to undermine any and all forms of opposition to the agenda they want to insert into our law, society and economics. They began to fit their objectors with “Black Hats” and “Handlebar Mustaches” and parade them down “Main St.” for ridicule and debasement.

           Over the course of the last 6 months, we have seen CEOs, Financial Institutions, Auto Company executives and “NOW” Insurance Companies, labeled as thieves, greedy, destructive to the American economy, out sourcing jobs and businesses, users of the “little guy” and so on. While all of this has been plastered all over magazines, what’s left of the newspaper industry to say nothing of the Television broadcast news outlets, not a word on the role that Congress has played in the collapse of the economy. Not a word about the “unintended consequences” that were the result of government intrusion.

          We did hear, “Too big to fail” in regards to “bailing out” the financial industry. We did hear that Tim Geithner was, “Too intelligent to dismiss from consideration for Treasury Secretary”, in spite of the fact that he, now in charge of the IRS, didn’t pay his own taxes for several years. We did hear that it was necessary to pass the Stimulus Bill in order to get Americans back to work. Those “Americans”, so far, are getting jobs in government and the “shovel ready jobs” were “there” and the “shoveling” had nothing to do with “infrastructure”, if you know what I mean.

          Jobs have gone to an Executive order of administrators they are calling Czars, who have power and authority, not elected by the people or confirmed by the people who “were” elected to represent them. And why aren’t these elected officials challenging that?

         Any questions or opposition to any of the actions taken by the administration and congress was met with the “Black Hat” and “Handlebar Mustache”. They were labeled “ideologs”, the ones who got us here in the first place, people comfortable with the status quo, and my absolute favorite, “We inherited this mess!! It’s going to take quick and rapid legislation to get us out of it”.

        The tactic of demonizing the Insurance Companies, for whatever reason, got derailed and that “train” has now gotten on the tracks to "demonize the American people" who, in the personal matter of Health Care, have heighted their concerns for its “reform”. Opposition has shown up at Town Hall meetings to make their oppositions known and to ask the questions that directly impact them and the lives of their families. Instead of listening and answering the questions and addressing the concerns, Nancy Peloci and Barbara Boxer, both of California (hmmmm), have lead the charge of demonization of the people who “dare to question” their intentions and efforts. Far be it that this bill is gaining a more pungent odor as parts of it are revealed by those who “have” read the bill and “understand it”. Some of the congress people are canceling their Town Halls not wanting to deal with the opposition and having to explain something that they may not have read or understand. It’s somewhat chilling to learn that not reading entire bills before a vote is a common practice in our congress. Cancelling these Town Halls is a clear indication that these people have forgotten; even dismissed the knowledge of who they work for. Instead, we are labeled as a “Astroturf” movement, a mob created by the GOP and special interest groups and organized “Brooks Brothers” protestors, sent to these Town Halls, who would probably rather sip on a single malt, suck on a ceeegar and rant over the upcoming football season.

       Now I am not suggesting that we behave as they did in Iran. I AM NOT!!! But I think we should pick a day and show up either on the steps of the Capital in Washington or the steps of our respective State Capitals en mass to let them “see” that we are serious about our opposition to the direction things are going. ACORN could, would and it would be allowed and acceptable. If “We, the People” did it, and we were met with military force to disperse, that would then show just “what” these people have in mind and to what extent they would go to, to see it through. It is clear that they don’t want to listen to the American people. They will not debate this any more than they held any other debate over the Stimulus, Cap and Trade, purchasing the auto companies, bailing out banks and financial institutions, nothing.

     This is the way of “Progressives”. They have no regard for the Constitution or the will of the people and even less for the process, that is in place in the Constitution, that would give them legal footing to propose what it is they are doing.  Maybe it’s time to “Change” the way “We, The People” assert ourselves and our will and return this to, Government OF the People, BY the People and FOR the People.
Just a thought…
More later.   
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BLACKMAIL,SHAKEDOWN,DEMONIZATION & FALSEHOODS Part 1

         It's been a while since I have last had the time to spill my thoughts in the Town Hall. In the immortal words of  Popeye the Sailor, "That's all I can stand and I can't stand it no more"!!
 
"We should do NOTHING"?
       President Obama, on every opposition to his policies, makes the claim of "partisan politics" and or "they would rather do nothing". Heaven forbid there is disagreement because the plan won't work or just flat our stinks.
       It was somewhat ironic that the passage of Cap and Trade in the House coincided with the death of Michael Jackson. Cap and Trade went way back in the news cycle and coverage on television and to page 23 in the newspapers, such that even now, it still looms under the radar of the government intrusions since January 20th.  The fact of Nancy Peloci's  investments, personally, in alternative energy doesn't seem to reflect a conflict of interests with her role as Speaker of the House. She boldly refused to allow discussion on the House floor back in September and Republicans didn't call her to task on it.
       I don't think that rational people want to continue to get our oil from "foreign" nations. Truth of the matter is, unless you consider Canada and Mexico "foreign" in the same sense as the Middle East, we don't get the majority of our oil from "foreign" sources. We get it right here in our own hemisphere. That said, the rational recourse would be to drill for our own oil in our waters and our lands. Build the necessary refineries and "OOPS" actually create the "JOBS" that this administration "claims" to have as its priority. Getting people back to work instead will be relegated to "Green Jobs", based on a premise of "clean energy" so as not to destroy the planet, is rooted in a false premise, or at the very least, a premise that is not up for debate or discussion. Talk about your "partisan politics". 
      "Alternative Energy" should be "Diversified Energy". As one of the largest countries in the world, with such diversified climates and conditions, all potentials of energy should be explored and included for not only the energy aspect of the recovery, but the employment aspects as well. Solar panels and windmill parts are already being manufactured "overseas". With union implications to our taking up that job would only serve to increase the costs,but I digress.
       President Obama. No one is saying, "do nothing" about energy. We are just saying your premise for limited sources of energy calls for honest debate and Nancy Peloci needs to recuse herself from the debate and the voting process because of her conflict of interest on the subject.
 
      Interesting that with all of the policies being addressed by this administration that they claim will be impacted by the surging number of "Baby Boomers" that will enter the entitlement roster, there is no discussion about Social Security, an area that "partisan politics" kicked to the curb during the Bush administration. Instead, Health Care is taking center stage and is as much of an entitlement program and as much as a "third rail".
     There is a reason that it has been kicked down the road for some 20 years. It doesn't work run by government any more than the Post Office does. But let's put that aside. The main reason why Health Insurance hasn't worked and has become more costly even to the private insurers, are the peripheral effects such as  frivolous law suits and the redundant oversight  and over testing that comes as a result.
      Here is the problem. How do we get "lawyers" in elected government positions to set a ruling to control frivolous court cases docketed by other lawyers? In the efforts to cover themselves from these lawsuits, doctors must take out huge insurance policies and demand extra tests to satisfy the companies. So who gets demonized? The doctors and the insurance companies as "government" protects "lawyers" and their intrusion on the health industry process. Tort Reform has to be addressed first if they genuinely want to bring costs down. In these frivolous lawsuits, win, lose or draw, the lawyers prosper while all other areas of the process are on the "crap table" looking to win, minimize damages or break even. 
      President Obama. Serving "your" cronies any different from the claim your party made of Bush and Cheney serving "theirs" in oil?
 
     Why is it that when "cuts" have to be made, the first things to "go" are, police, fireman and teachers? Why doesn't some of the government subsidies, here and abroad, like the Endowment of the Arts or the never ending "foreign aid" programs get their budgets cut. For that matter, why doesn't "spending" in general get cut in the non essentials?
     When I was a child back in the 50's, I remember C.A.R.E. They would  show us pictures of children in Africa or in the Far East with pot bellies and flies in their face. Pitiful images. If we have been sending money all these years to address this issue, why is the problem with those same pitiful images still existing? Are they the same pictures from back then or are these the children of the people who had the pot bellies and flies in their faces?
    President Obama. You have freely designated taxpayer dollars for projects and programs that will run over the next 10 years, which in and of itself, most of us have no clue as to where we will be in the next 4 years let alone 10. What has most of us Republicans who supported George W Bush disappointed in his terms was his "lose" of the Veto Pen, which he only used on Embryonic Stem Cell research that "you" rescinded. This gives you the "right" to double down on the deficits that you never fail to mention you "inherited"? And by the way, you ran for the office. This is what you wanted and "said" you could correct. You promised transparency, bipartisanship and a "change" in the politics of Washington, none of which are in evidence in these first six months and don't appear to be on the horizon.
    President Obama, it is a very cheap tactic to demonize opposition in order to elevate "your" position. If your position has any substance or righteousness, it should be able to stand on its own, tall against opposition regardless of the root nature, i.e. "partisan politics". It is equally a cheap tactic to infer that the "opposition" would rather do "nothing". There "is" the possibility, in spite of your inflated perception of brilliance and foresightedness, that you could just be wrong and the "opposition" just might have a better solution.
Just a thought....
More later      
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »